Abstract
Problem and purpose. The purpose of this study was to identify the specific knowledge and skills principals use to sustain site-based shared decision making at selected middle schools in Ventura and Los Angeles Counties and to determine which of these skills and knowledge are perceived by the principal to be most important. Methodology. This study uses an ex post facto descriptive design. In-person interviews were conducted with nine principals who had sustained site-based shared decision making for three or more years. Findings and conclusions. The key findings from these data suggest the following conclusions if site-based shared decision making is to be sustained in schools: (1) Preparation programs for school administrators should include theory and practice in group dynamics, building collegiality, and site-based decision-making; (2) principals must use a variety of methods that will foster a climate of trust, and build a strong environment for shared decisions to be recognized and sustained by all stakeholders; (3) principals must be able to implement a vision that will make the staff and community aware of the school's potential; (4) principals must be able to meld all diverse groups into a cohesive force directed toward the implementation of a well-planned and well thought out education program to serve the student of the school; (5) leaders should intentionally develop interpersonal skills and strategies to sustain shared decision making with groups over time; (6) reflective thought and engaging in various workshops practiced by successful leaders recognizes the importance of knowledge and skills for sustained site-based decision making. Recommendations for further studies. Recommendations from the study include: (1) A study should be conducted to determine if site-based decision making has contributed to the overall success of students; (2) a study should be done to see if districts are moving away from decentralization and moving towards centralization; (3) is site-based decision making used primarily for political reasons; (4) replication studies should be performed using a larger sample; (5) a study should be conducted to determine the types of professional development that support principals and staff to sustain a site-based decision-making model.