Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine how Instructional System Development (ISD) mandated program evaluation was being implemented in the USAF Air Training Command (ATC) formal schools and training locations. The study gathered information on internal and external evaluation methods, program elements, and satisfaction with evaluation programs. Methodology. A four part survey consisting of 56 questions was sent to 93 ATC schools and training location Commanders representing the four major ATC training categories. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Findings and conclusions. The research found that survey respondents are using ISD internal and external evaluation methods. 100% use internal and 81% external methods. External evaluation was being accomplished through in-house course reviews and student critiques. External field evaluation methods being used included questionnaires, field visits, and controlled job-performance evaluation. Course control documents, resources, instructional facilities, instructor performance, and measurement (testing program), were some of the program elements evaluated during internal course reviews. Participant schools were all above the "Somewhat satisfied" category concerning their school's internal and external evaluation programs. This research will form an empirically based body of information about program evaluation methods and program elements in Air Training Command Schools. Recommendations. Increased emphasis on controlled job-performance methods. Establish communication channels so that schools can network with each other on program evaluation issues.